Sunday, December 9, 2012

PJ Media » How Muslims Celebrated Islamophobia Awareness Month

PJ Media » How Muslims Celebrated Islamophobia Awareness Month


How Muslims Celebrated Islamophobia Awareness Month

In Norway, a Muslim politician, Khalid Haji Ahmed, wrote on Facebook: “Damn Jew whores, wish Hitler could come back and shower you some more.”
by
ROBERT SPENCER
December 8, 2012 - 11:17 pm
“Islamophobic prejudice is worryingly prevalent in the mainstream; on display in political life, in the the [sic] media and in the attitudes of the police and the courts.” So said a poster for Islamophobia Awareness Month, which Muslims in Britain and Europe marked with a series of events throughout November. The inaugural event in London on November 2 featured talks from human rights lawyer Imran Khan; Peter Oborne, the chief political commentator forThe Daily Telegraph; Labour MP Jeremy Corbyn; Lindsey German of the Stop the War Coalition; and many others. But other Muslims worldwide had their own creative ways to mark the special month:
  • In Florida, two Muslim brothers, Raees Alam Qazi and Sheheryar Alam Qazi, were charged with conspiring to use a weapon of mass destruction in the cause of jihad to commit mass murder of Americans.
  • In Tehran, Muslims brutally murdered and dismembered a Jewish woman, in the crowning episode of an ongoing attempt to seize her property for use by an adjoining mosque.
  • In Moscow, a Muslim, Ilyas Saidov, received a fifteen-year prison sentence for his role in plotting jihad-martyrdom suicide bombing attacks.
  • In Baghdad, Sunni Muslims used three car bombs to murder 23 Shi’ite Muslims who were participating in processions for Ashura, the Shi’ite mourning festival marking the death of the Shi’ite leader Husayn bin Ali in the battle of Karbala against the Sunnis in the year 680.
  • In Norway, a Muslim politician, Khalid Haji Ahmed, wrote on Facebook: “Damn Jew whores, wish Hitler could come back and shower you some more.”
  • A Florida imam, Abu Taubah (a.k.a. Marcus Robertson), was exposed as having ties to the Blind Sheikh, Omar Abdel Rahman, mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center jihad bombing.
  • Hamas’s official al-Aqsa TV station ran a music video containing the words: “Killing Jews is worship that draws us close to Allah.”
  • In India, a young Muslim who had appeared on a television show speaking about his fear of being honor-killed for marrying without his parents’ consent was indeed murdered.
  • In Libya, a jihadist group claiming to operate under authority of the Ministry of the Interior kidnapped twelve men it accused of homosexual activity, and threatened them with mutilation and execution.
  • In Austria, Muslims protesting against Israel’s defensive action in Gaza chanted “Death to the Jews” while their leftist fellow protesters looked on in silence.
  • On Facebook, a Muslim posted an admiring photo of Adolf Hitler, with the caption: “I could have killed all the Jews, but I left some of them to let you know why I was killing them.” Many other Muslims chimed in with “likes” and favorable comments.
  • In Mali, Muslim officials arrested three Catholics for the crime of declining to listen to an Islamic sermon.
  • In Nigeria, Muslims bombed a church and ambushed churchgoers, murdering fourteen Christians.
  • And a Muslim wrote a comment at my website, saying: “Whenever I see Robert Spenser’s [sic] face I feel like having my palms around his neck, its a good thing we never meet eye to eye because he would be licking my boots if we ever did. I’m actually a very reserved and polite gent but when I hear that guy’s voice or see his face I feel like shutting him up permanently.”
That list doesn’t actually take us through the whole of “Islamophobia Awareness Month.” All that happened in just the past two weeks.
Meanwhile, a Malaysian politician urged his government to take “stern action” against those who “tarnish the image of Islam.” But by this he didn’t mean any of the Islamic jihadists listed above, or any others like them; rather, he wants to silence those who dare to point out how such jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify their violence.
And that also was the point of “Islamophobia Awareness Month”: to intimidate non-Muslims into thinking that there was something wrong, something “bigoted” and even “racist,” with resisting jihad violence and exploring its root causes within Islam. There is no justification under any circumstances for denying anyone equality of rights before the law or attacking innocent people.
The great weakness of the “Islamophobia” narrative is that virtually every day Muslims around the world show the justification for suspicion of the fanatically devout and pious believers. And the cries of “Islamophobia” that come from peaceful Muslims instead of honest self-appraisal and genuine reform not only do nothing to allay those suspicions, but only reinforce them. But then Islamic supremacist groups in the U.S., such as the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), use the very suspicions they have created by their disingenuousness for jihad terror and Islamic doctrine as new evidence of “Islamophobia.” The whole thing becomes self-enforcing.
In reality, the world doesn’t need awareness of “Islamophobia,” a manipulative, chimera construct. It needs awareness of how jihadis use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and supremacism. That’s why I, inspired by a video of Pat Condell, have designated December Hatred and Violence in the Qur’an Awareness Month. At my website, JihadWatch.org, I am featuring daily posts quoting and explaining hateful and violent passages in the Qur’an – which incite many more people to violence than “Islamophobia” ever has or will.
In this age of near-universal obfuscation and denial of the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat, that’s what the free world needs awareness of most of all.
Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book, Did Muhammad Exist?, is now available.
PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

26 Comments, 10 Threads

  1. 1. Bulgaricus
    Well, what else would one expect from muslims & islam?
    • Ricky
      Islamophobia my ass Those paragons of humanity should be exposed for what they are and stop babying them with the PC.
  2. Here is the poop and the scoop on ‘Islamophobia’ -http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/06/islamophobia-their-propagandists-western-enablers-who-shield-islamic-supremacists-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…and westerners, who still wish to keep their head atop their shoulders, should shout from the rooftops – they too are proud to be ‘Islamophobes’!!
    • MN
      No, we should not call ourselves Islamophobes but rather crusaders, a name that the jihadis have already learned to hate and fear.
  3. 3. canuck
    Like homophobia, islamophobia is a manufactured word designed to cut off any discussion, accurate description of facts or especially criticism when logic and reason will not suffice. “Phobia” is a fear of and has nothing to do with disdain for primitive beliefs, savagery, misogyny, intolerance, injustice, duplicity and all the other 7th Century conduct used to control the ignorant masses for the benefit of the few. Given the primitive and duplicitous nature of the beast anyone with a functioning brain that values our free society should be “islamophobic”.
  4. 4. Islamist in Londonistan, Saudi Britannia, Eurabia, Dar al-Harb
    We are peaceful, as the Koran teaches. Murder is forbidden. But killing in self-defense is not murder. If an oppressor lays violent hands upon us, are we not obligated to defend ourselves?
    • MN
      It is not an attack on you to insult Islam. If you think it is, then I have to defend myself against you.
      • bill
        Just to point out the obvious, a “phobia” is an IRRATIONAL. fear Maybe this should be disseminated throughout societies.
    • Cyril Yusupov
      Yes, but Koran and Sunnah clarify that the worst oppression is shirk (polytheism) and that an oppressor is he who does not govern according to Allah’s revelation. Also, when a disbeliever stands in the way of the expansion of the Khilafah state by refusing to pay the Jizyah as a Dhimmi subject under the Shari’ah, such warfare as is waged upon him by the mujahideen is classified as defending the deen al-haq from the conspiracies of mischievous non-Muslims.
    • Gork
      “Self-Defense?” Allow me to point out that history is littered with megalomaniac potentates who conquered many nations “in self defense.”
      Is it “self-defense” if someone criticizes the Koran or the Hadith? Is it “self-defense” if a woman born to a Muslim family decides to marry a non-Muslim? Is it “self-defense” if businesses and religious families refuse to pay “Jizya” to their clearly superior Muslim overlords?
      You see, the “self-defense” line is often used by those who argue their own supremacist ideas. It is often like those mobsters who insist they’re selling “fire-insurance” to their “clients.”
      We have seen centuries of Muslim supremacist behavior. In those centuries, we know of none who identified themselves as Muslim who argued forcefully against these horrific practices. Instead we read mealy-mouth justifications of such nonsense as “how to beat your wife according to Islam.”
      When Islam breaks away from their 7th Century thinking, when they start taking an interpretive view of what the Koran says, when they consider how awful some of the Hadith is, then there can be an honest dialog. Until then, I will remain an Anti-Islamist.
      No, I have no phobia against Islam. I detest it, just as I detest any kind of supremacist thinking that is used to justify thuggery, misogyny, racism, enslavement, and so forth.
      • Kitsune
        No, even then, we cannot have an honest dialogue, thanks to the concepts of Taqiyya and Muruna.
        When you consider that they are ORDERED to lie to the Kafir (Taqiyya) and even ignore The Shari’ah when living in a non-Shari’ah nation (Muruna, in order to instill a false confidence into the Kafir that the Ummah will not impose The Shari’ah on them once they get power)
        There is just no way.
        Until somehow Taqiyya can be done away with, I just don’t see it.
    • Indio Viejo
      Your are entitled to defend your satanic cult in Saudi Arabia where it originated. But now that you have imposed an aggressive war of conquest on the world, you are offensive and should suffer the consequences. Immigrating to the west and trying to change the law is not only offensive but criminal, every Islamist should be prosecuted and then executed (within the law).
    • Poppakap
      …and those Muslim parents who murder because a son is marrying someone whom the family does not approve are killing in self defense? Those Muslim parents who murder because their daughter is behaving “too western” are killing in self defense? Those Muslims who murder Christians because the Christians refuse forced conversion to Islam are killing in self defense?
      Sorry JihadJoe, your words ring hollow and self serving. The deathly fruits of your cult are visible for the world to see. Those that embrace freedom, humanity, truth, and love reject you and your ideology because our very existence depends on it.
  5. 5. rodguy911
    We need to learn from the Japanese.
    They allow the mad muzzies to visit but not stay.
    They can come for a while but must leave. No mosques no islam no nothing from the wacky world of Islam.
    It’s all the muzzies understand,stay the hell out and don’t come back other than for a visit and to drop a few yen.
    Too bad we don’t get it.
    • Good point, Japan has not bought into the muliticulti stuff that the USA has been sold, to our perpetual disadvantage.
  6. 6. EscapeVelocity
    Jamie Foxx just exclaimed how great it was that he killed all the white people in his newist movie.
    It behooves White Europeans to organize for their own protection. There are groups filled with hatred that are gaining power in all our institutions, in schools and media, and in the halls of government power.
  7. 7. Brutus
    I’ve read Spencer off and on over the years, finding him somewhat entertaining but ultimately disappointing. What, pray tell, does Mr. Spencer propose we do about the threat of radical Islam? This is always the problem with Spencer, Gaffney, Geller, et al. They are always alerting us to the menace of radical Islam but never suggest solutions. What does they want? A perpetual Holy War? Turn our backs and disengage with the Muslim world? Bare our teeth and talk tough? More targeted assassinations and drone strikes – or fewer? The best I can tell is that Spencer and the rest of Islamaphobia lobby are simply shilling for the military industrial complex, bereft of solutions beyond raising money off of sowing fear.
    • Indioviejo
      I believe is up to you what you would like to do about it. Their job of diseminating truth is heroic. Perhaps Jeremiah. Better still, what would you like to do?
    • Poppakap
      Epic fail brutus. Your jihadist sympathies are veiled much too thinly.
      Can you identify any single point of Spencer’s work that is not true? If not, then he is not causing fear. That is sheer projection on your part. The fear is caused by the heinous actions of jihadists themselves. This kind of moral relativism is not only intellectually lazy, it is patently dishonest.
    • Anonymous
      ooh, the Islamophobia “lobby”! what does THAT remind me of? hmm….
      you’re about a subtle as a Qassam rocket aimed at a kindergarten, Brutus.
      got news for you: Robert Spencer isn’t a politician. he’s a journalist. and he’s doing what journalists are supposed to do: reporting what’s happening.
  8. 8. Leatherneck
    I find it strange the CFR government is helping Islam grow stronger within region 4. With examples like the above, they must have sold out to an agenda for a tidy sum of money, and power.
    BTW, the only extremists, or radicals within Islam are the Apostates. Get that through your thick civilian skulls.
    • Terence57
      Yes. There’s a huge “silent majority” of muslims and they aren’t on the side of the apostates.
  9. 9. Dr McCosker
    Brutus, above, most likely a Muslim in a mask trying a spot of well-poisoning, condemns Spencer for not offering a program to limit the spread of Islam. (Note that I do not, myself, say ‘radical Islam’. There is only Islam, Islam, Islam.)
    Well, any person with a shred of commonsense who has read Spencer’s discussions of Islam, and has done their homework for themselves, is capable of figuring out the obvious.
    Any majority or almost entirely non-Muslim land, to defend itself against the Jihad, requires to do the following
    1/ STOP permitting Muslims inside its gates. Just…stop. They can’t be let in: not as legal or illegal ‘refugees’, ‘asylum seekers’ or immigrants, not as ‘tourists’, ‘businessmen’ or ‘students’, and not even, realistically speaking, as diplomats. Because wherever there are Muslims, sooner or later there is Jihad; the Muslim attempt – waged first by fraud when they are fewer and weaker, and then by open and often extreme violence once they feel themselves strong enough – to dominate and domineer over the surrounding non-Muslims and exploit and terrorise them.
    Then there is 2/ – the recognition that the *existing* Muslim presence within any majority non-Muslim land, on any one of the five inhabited continents, constitutes a Fifth Column, the sea within which the jihadis swim and from which, ceaselessly, they emerge. No Ummah in a country? = no possibility of Jihad waged from within. And, therefore, all sorts of non-Muslim countries – in Asia, the Americas, the Pacific, Europe – if they wish to survive as non-Muslim countries, are going to have to muster up the courage to start *evicting* the Muslims from within their borders, into those lands already entirely lost to Islam. Just as the Czechs, after WWII, threw out their German population who had been used as a stalking-horse and entering wedge by Hitler. I simply cannot see an alternative, for though I welcome bona fide apostates from Islam – every Muslim who truly leaves Islam is one more human being freed from a monstrous and deadly delusion – the Muslims within the non-Muslim lands are not leaving Islam – apostasising – at a rate that would bring about an acceptable reduction in the threat level.
    And 3/ – once one has no Muslims resident within the gates, and has stopped Muslims from using ‘peaceful’ means to gain entry, one must be prepared to fortify against and actively and massively resist all Muslim attempts to *force* entry by violence – e.g. by open or covert invasion, beginning at the level of sporadic cross-border jihad / ghazi raids, like the one that took place at Mumbai in November 2008.
    But none of this is going to be even remotely possible until a strong majority of the non-Muslim citizens, whether in a subsaharan African Christian country, a western secular country, or in Hindu India or Buddhist Thailand, completely understands what Islam is about: its practices, methods and goals, and the types of destructive behaviours and attitudes that are programmed into its adherents. Only when one *knows* – from looking at the Islamic texts, listening to the Islamic ‘clerics’ loudly boasting and threatening, and from looking at the abundantly documented historic track record of the Mohammedan Mob – will one grasp how menacing and how dangerous the Ummah is, considered as a human gestalt, and be prepared to take the kinds of measures necessary to protect one’s society and homeland.
    Spencer and many others like him are educating the public. Once the public knows what Islam is, stripped of all the illusions and masks with which it has concealed its real menace, then we can move to the next step: defending ourselves.
    • David IV of Georgia
      Before anyone bothers to call the doctor racist, please take some time to read some of the Islamic holy books like the Hadith. They can be found online with a Google search. And once you read them—yes, people believe and live that stuff. Many Islamic books written for Muslims are published in English.
  10. 10. David IV of Georgia
    Sure, I fear Islam. I’ll fight or offer them my neck, but they can’t have my labor or jizrah.
    My grandfather feared Nazis. He had scars all over his body from his fighting them from the beaches of France to Berlin. He feared them, but he did his part to stop them.
    The pseudonym I chose, David IV of Georgia, was a king of Georgia. When he inherited the throne his country was weak and overrun with Muslims who were demanding more and more concessions each day. Saint King David decided it was too much. He placed restrictions on the Muslims. They whined to the Sultan, Mohammed bin Mohammed. Sultan Mo bin Mo declared a jihad against the Kingdom of Georgia. The Georgians were vastly outnumbered—but the Georgians won a decisive victory over the jihad. Muslims haven’t bothered Georgia for the last 800 years as a result.

Leave a Reply

 
 
 
 We know you're busy. Sign up for our Daily Digest email to get a quick look each day at our editors' picks and readers' favorite stories. (You will receive an email asking you to verify your email address. If you have previously subscribed, no verification email will be sent.)

No comments:

Post a Comment