There are two focuses I'm trying to keep PFA on
Replies to This Discussion
- Permalink Reply by
- Twana, I agree on being focused. Forgive my ignorance, but what is a BTR conference?Not wanting to be like either of the Clintons is more than admirable; its a given!
- Permalink Reply by
- BTR is Blog Talk Radio. I pay a monthly fee for a online Radio Channel. I host a live (that will be archived) show which we use to share information about projects/initiatives that we're working on. If I ask you to be involved in a project, I think it only right, respectful and honorable to share as much info with you as possible, keep you up to date in movements etc of the plan of actions. I can do a show once a day if I choose, however, I only do them when needed. And depending on how much information we need to share with you all, determines the amount of time of the show. It can run up to 2 hours. Usually to share the information it would only take about an hour to an hour in a half, but, I find we usually have to do a 2 hr show/conference to also explain why many other agendas pushers plan won't work. That is where division comes into play. Agent dividers?
We do vet all that info. That way we know if there are some we can reach out to knowing they understand the depth of the works we're doing. But I find some only want to link arms with us to change our plan of action to their agenda. Again, disappointing, but I'm use to it now and have no problem shutting that down if I must.
- Permalink Reply by
- Twana,One thing women can do, for those here that don't have it, is get their CCW permit AND take a personal defense class with the weapon. It's not just having the weapon, but the knowledge in engaging and the fortitude to use it in a case of defense where Deadly Force must be used for their protection.Another class is TFT defense classes, for the times when you are unarmed. This is not "Chuck Norris" Kung Fu...etc.....this is a STREET FIGHTING DEFENSE Class......here is an example......Don't think this is for just men.......women can be just as lethal.............Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis
- Permalink Reply by
- I teach a Krav Maga class 2 evenings per week. It's amazing how the women attendees' confidence level increases after only a few months, knowing they needn't be a victim if someone puts unwelcome hands on them. Krav Maga is the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) hand-to-hand combat training (it means contact combat in Hebrew). It uses major muscle groups and gross motor skills (because fine motor skills and higher-level cognitive thinking both disappear when the "stuff" hits your personal fan) and is easy to learn and commit the basics to muscle memory. It's also a good workout. I would encourage anybody to look for a class near you.
- Permalink Reply by
- Thank you Betty I was about to ask the same question.
- Permalink Reply by
- Twana, beyond the education system that must be changed is the Judicial System. I applaud PFA for making this one of the foremost agenda items. Those who may have availed themselves of the reporting of the Legal/Judicial system corruption across this country by Sharon Rondeau of the Post & Email are aware of how rampant it is. This is not to promote this on line news source but to alert PFA's membership that there is an active research and reporting that is and has been ongoing for the last few years that may be worthy of partnering with for factual information.A case is being reported here in California where a Judge, Margaret Downing, stated in open court; "the Constitution does not apply in my court". When I read that I started to investigate how I could wake that judge up to the facts of the Constitution. I found there is a Commission for Judicial Review where I could file a complaint. I received an answer from the Commission that the actions of this judge would be investigated and I would be notified when and if anything was determined. That sounded great and I wait for any details.This case was again heard in court on the 20th of Nov. and it is reported that the demeanor of this judge and the actions that occured were completely different than before. I like to think that the complaint I filed made a difference, we shall see as the case was extended to the 17th of this month.For those not aware this case is about the DCFS (Department of Children and Family Services) using the court to strip a couple of their 7 (seven) children, one an infant and the court in violation of the parents and childrens rights putting the children up for adoption, two of the boys to a lesbian couple.Like I said I am not promoting another site/service or agenda. Anyone who wants to know more just respond to this comment.Semper Fi
- Permalink Reply by
- Tim and Sharon do talk phrowt.
- Permalink Reply by
- Twana: During the 2010 campaign (in Utah), our Senator Mike Lee was running against an opponent where the race was closely divided. Every time my wife and I could attend their public meetings, I kept asking them the question, "Would you support legislation (amendment) that would require all Federal judges to render decisions based on original intent and NOT case law, where any decisions made would cite the Constitution and/or the intent of the founding fathers regarding the issue at hand; and furthermore, require that if a Federal judge was found out of line with their decisions, they would be immediately impeached and tried for, in the very least, perjury against the sworn oath of office taken upon being elected/appointed to their judiciary position?" Senator Lee was, at first, not in favor, but later publicly stated that he would favor it as long as some case law were allowed to be used in building the basis for decision. His opponent quickly grabbed the idea and supported it. While I do not have any high expectations at this time that such legislation could be passed, I believe it should be one corner stone that builds a foundation for fixing the Judicial System. The Judiciary, at any level, is of primary importance in making proper rulings in line with the original intent of founding fathers when they drafted the Constitution. It holds, by law, the government's ability to either function within the bounds the Constitution originally set, or allow the Government to run astray - which is plain to see is currently happening. If the judiciary were functioning properly, "we the people" would have a lawful recourse to stand against the tyranny that is creeping upon us. Currently, the law is not on the side of "we the people" in defending ourselves against tyranny - we only have a moral and ethical basis to stand upon.As for your efforts to get women trained to protect themselves and their children, I applaud you. The moral fabric in America is quickly deteriorating, movements are afoot to allow Sharia Law to become increasingly rooted, and the so-called women's right's movement will find itself running in full circle and devouring it's own tail. Young men are growing up with so much hatred in their hearts and disrespect for women that women will eventually become no more than a piece of property to be used for whatever they desire - which seems the norm under Sharia Law. Keep up the fight.
No comments:
Post a Comment